共享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)經(jing)(jing)濟(ji)的“火”消了以(yi)后，許(xu)多人開始(shi)質(zhi)(zhi)疑共享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)單車，共享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)充(chong)電器這些產品其實(shi)并不算“共享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)經(jing)(jing)濟(ji)”，本(ben)質(zhi)(zhi)上還(huan)是一種租賃經(jing)(jing)濟(ji)。那么共享(xiang)充電器到底(di)算(suan)不(bu)算(suan)“共享”呢？

從本質上來(lai)看，共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)充(chong)(chong)電寶(bao)(bao)與共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)單(dan)車其實有異(yi)曲同工之妙，共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)單(dan)車通(tong)過(guo)共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)單(dan)車平(ping)臺提(ti)供單(dan)車來(lai)解決(jue)(jue)用(yong)戶最后一(yi)(yi)公里的出行難題，而共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)充(chong)(chong)電寶(bao)(bao)則通(tong)過(guo)共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)充(chong)(chong)電寶(bao)(bao)提(ti)供的充(chong)(chong)電寶(bao)(bao)來(lai)解決(jue)(jue)用(yong)戶最后一(yi)(yi)分鐘的充(chong)(chong)電難題。它們當(dang)然算是(shi) “共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)”，只是(shi)這種共(gong)(gong)享(xiang)是(shi)資(zi)源再度配置(zhi)和分配的另外一(yi)(yi)種表達方式(shi)而已(yi)。

通(tong)過(guo)一(yi)種(zhong)資(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)集中(zhong)供給的(de)(de)方式(shi)(shi)來解決(jue)用戶(hu)普(pu)遍(bian)存在的(de)(de)充電難題，讓(rang)資(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)通(tong)過(guo)共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)平臺實現共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)達(da)到重復利(li)用的(de)(de)目的(de)(de)，這種(zhong)共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)方式(shi)(shi)一(yi)方面(mian)能夠實現共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)經濟(ji)供方資(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)提(ti)供不(bu)足的(de)(de)問(wen)題，另外一(yi)方面(mian)能夠解決(jue)共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)經濟(ji)的(de)(de)需求(qiu)方的(de)(de)需求(qiu)無(wu)法(fa)得到最大程度滿足的(de)(de)問(wen)題。它所做(zuo)的(de)(de)其實是資(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)配置方式(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)改變，通(tong)過(guo)這種(zhong)改變解決(jue)了(le)用戶(hu)痛點，做(zuo)了(le)一(yi)件(jian)在純(chun)粹(cui)的(de)(de)共(gong)享(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)經濟(ji)模式(shi)(shi)下(xia)無(wu)法(fa)實現的(de)(de)事情。

因此，并不(bu)(bu)是(shi)(shi)說(shuo)只有用戶對(dui)用戶才(cai)算(suan)共享(xiang)，而由商(shang)家提供(gong)服務(wu)就不(bu)(bu)算(suan)共享(xiang)了(le)(le)。共享(xiang)充電(dian)器的存在、是(shi)(shi)資(zi)源(yuan)配(pei)置不(bu)(bu)均衡、供(gong)給方式(shi)不(bu)(bu)合理共同造(zao)成的。設想一下，如果(guo)共享(xiang)充電(dian)器作為一項基礎服務(wu)已經全面(mian)普及開來了(le)(le)，那么充電(dian)寶是(shi)(shi)不(bu)(bu)是(shi)(shi)可以丟棄了(le)(le)呢？